Archive for the ‘Barnett Shale’ Category

Asbestos Drilling Mud Additives Still a Health Risk

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

Individuals who worked on drilling rigs from the 1960s through the 1980s likely were exposed to asbestos from additives used as part of the drilling mud system. During these years, oilfield workers such as roughnecks, roustabouts, derrickmen, mudmen and others often worked with drilling muds and various drilling mud additives that were used in the mud circulation system. The mud circulation system worked throughout the drilling process to help lift and remove cuttings and debris from the wellbore as well as to help cool down the drill bit. The drilling mud system typically included a series of large mud pumps, a mud or mixing hopper, shale shaker, and reserve pit. The drilling muds and additives flowed through the drill pipe and out of the drill bit. Fluid pressure from the mud pumps would then circulate the drilling mud back out of the well bore and back through again.

Asbestos drilling mud additives were used throughout the drilling industry in Texas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Louisiana, North and South Dakota, and in many other locations across the United States as well as on off-shore rigs during the 60s, 70s and 80s. Some of the formations across the US and the world where these materials were used include: Midland Basin, Williston Basin, Andarko Basin, North Slope, North Sea, Wilcox trends and numerous off-shore drilling locations.

Inhalation of asbestos fibers can cause malignant mesothelioma, a cancer of the lining of the lung, as well as lung cancer. “Countless oilfield workers were exposed to this deadly fiber,” says Texas mesothelioma attorney Ben DuBose “and unfortunately, many of those workers are now beginning to be diagnosed with asbestos related cancers.”

Texas Supreme Court Rules Against Texas Land Owners

Thursday, October 9th, 2008

On August 29th the Texas Supreme Court rendered it’s much awaited decision in Coastal Oil & Gas Corp., et al v. Garza Energy Trust et al.  Unfortunately, the Court held that the rule of capture – a legal doctrine which establishes the ownership of minerals and water – does not allow a landowner to seek damages for subsurface trespass.

 Hydraulic fracturing, a modern drilling technique used in the Barnett Shale as well as other areas of Texas and the U.S., involves horizontal drilling and high pressure water to create fractures and cracks in shale and other tight gas formations.  These fractures increase production by acting as conduits or highways which drain natural gas back to the well bore.  The problem – the fractures can extend 1,500 to 2,000 feet or more and cross property and lease lines thereby draining neighboring leases. 

The Texas Supreme Court’s opinion is troubling for Texas property owners.  Essentially, the Court paved the way for gas producers to drain neighboring leases through a spider web of below ground fractures without having to compensate land owners.  What remedy is left for Texas land owners? The Court held that mineral rights owners can still bring claims against their own lessees for failing to produce natural gas or other minerals.   

To view the Court’s opinion in the Coastal Oil case see:  www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical/2008/aug/050466.htm

For news articles concerning Coastal Oil go to: www.fwbusinesspress.com/display.php?id=8314