Mesothelioma Asbestos Lawyer, DuBose Law Firm, PLLC

Main navigation

You are here: Home / Archives for Ben DuBose

Ben Dubose

Ben DuBose has over eighteen years of asbestos and serious personal injury litigation experience, successfully fighting for hundreds of mesothelioma victims in courts throughout the United States

Additional Employees Are Eligible for Overtime in 2020

By

As of September 24, 2019, an estimated 1.2 million employees will be eligible for overtime in 2020. This came about with an increase in the “white collar” exemption by the U.S. Department of Labor. It supports the mandate for overtime pay included in the Fair Labor Standards Act. It becomes effective January 1, 2020.

Which employees are eligible for overtime in 2020?

The FLSA requires that most employees in the United States be paid at least the federal minimum wage for all hours worked and overtime pay at not less than time and one-half the regular rate of pay for all hours worked over 40 hours in a workweek.

However, Section 13(a)(1) of the FLSA provides an exemption from both minimum wage and overtime pay for employees employed as bona fide executive, administrative, professional and outside sales employees. Section 13(a)(1) and Section 13(a)(17) also exempt certain computer employees. These exemptions are often called the “white-collar” or “EAP” exemptions. To qualify for exemption, employees generally must meet certain tests regarding their job duties and be paid on a salary basis at not less than $684 per week. Job titles do not determine exempt status. In order for an exemption to apply, an employee’s specific job duties and salary must meet all the requirements of the Department’s regulations.

Once implemented, the minimum annual salary threshold for the “white-collar” exemption will be $35,568, increasing eligibility for an additional 1.2 million more workers. Currently the threshold for the exemption applied to white collar workers making at least $23,000 annually.

The result will be that employees making less than $35,568 (as opposed to only $23,000), even if salaried, will be entitled to overtime pay.   The adjustment by the Department of Labor is aimed at increasing overall compensation in the work force by increasing the number of workers eligible for overtime pay and also increasing the minimum salary required for employers to take advantage of the “white collar” exception.   

What employees are exempt from overtime pay?

Employers must reevaluate employees, currently exempt, who are earning an annual salary under or slightly over the new threshold. To be given a “white-collar” exemption, there are tests. 

Executive exemption

The employee’s primary duty must be managing the enterprise or a department or subdivision of the enterprise. The employee must customarily and regularly direct the work of at least two employees and have the authority to hire or fire workers (or the employee’s suggestions and recommendations as to hiring, firing or changing the status of other employees must be given particular weight).

Administrative exemption

The employee’s primary duty must be office or non-manual work that is directly related to the management or general business operations of the employer or the employer’s customers. The employee’s primary duty also must include the exercise of discretion and independent judgment with respect to matters of significance.

Professional exemption

The employee’s primary duty must be work requiring advanced knowledge in a field of science or learning that is customarily acquired by prolonged, specialized, intellectual instruction and study.

Training needed for employers and employees

Employees in the pay gap between the current pay threshold of $23,000 and the new limit of $35,538 may not be tracking their work time. Under the new plan, all work time and overtime must be tracked. For employers, this may mean training for affected employees on time-keeping procedures.

Both employers and employees need awareness training on other features of the plan. Employers may count up to 10% of annual non-discretionary bonuses, incentives, and commissions toward an employee’s salary – sometimes bumping them above the $35,538 threshold and disqualifying them from overtime.

Employers may restructure by increasing the salary of some and reclassifying others to nonexempt. They may also create ways to limit overtime hours – especially for the newly nonexempt employees who are not familiar with tracking hours.

This will take some time for both sides to adapt to the new rules, but awareness of the rules and how they apply to your particular situation, will go a long way toward a smoother transition and less frustration. The timing of the new rule gives everyone three months to adjust and be ready for the new year.

In 2016, the Department of Labor under the Obama Administration previously set an even higher minimum salary requirement to qualify for one of the white collar exemptions.  The $47,476.00 minimum requirement established by the Obama Department of Labor would have protected even more workers (an estimated 4.2 million) by dramatically increasing the number of workers eligible for overtime pay and significantly increasing the minimum salary required for white collar exemptions from the overtime pay requirement.  

However, a US District Court ruling stopped implementation of the 2016 rule before it became final.   During the pendency of the appeal, the Department of Labor under the Trump administration decided to dismiss the appeal previously initiated by the Obama Department of Labor – thus ending final implementation of the even higher salary threshold.

Nevertheless, the current Department of Labor has made the current rule change to the $35,538 threshold which is an improvement under the previous number established in 2004. Overall, this is good news for both “white collar” exempt employees as well as employees who work over 40 hours as they can be assured they will be more fairly paid for time worked.

Statistics on Vaping-related Diseases and Deaths Rise

By

Statistics on vaping-related diseases and deaths rise almost daily, it seems.

  • On August 23, the first vape-related death was found. This patient used vaping for the nicotine content.
  • Another five deaths were reported within a month – some using vapes containing THC, others nicotine.
  • On September 11, the Trump Administration pushed for a ban on all flavored e-cigarettes in the US because of the attraction to under-aged youth.
  • By September 12, The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reported a confirmed 26 states reported 380 cases of illness from vaping in addition to the six deaths.
  • September 15, Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York announced the first state ban on all flavored e-cigarettes, except tobacco and menthol. Michigan followed with their statewide ban.
  • By September 26, The CDC stats rose to 805 cases of lung injury in 46 states and one territory. The death toll was 12 people.
  • By October 4, the FDA published a statement, “[T]he agency believes it is prudent to stop using vaping products that contain THC or that have had any substances added to them, including those purchased from retail establishments. Simply put, inhaling harmful contaminants in the lungs could put a patient’s health at risk and should be avoided.” The FDA warning included purchasing vapes containing THC from retail stores or on the street.

Vaping-related diseases and deaths in Texas

These confirmed cases may be the first wave of a tsunami of illness and death from these innocent-appearing and marketed devices. It is notable that September 25th, the CEO of Juul, Kevin Bruns, stepped down from his position. Juul launched in 2015 and by 2017 had a larger e-cigarette market share than any other competitor, including the major tobacco companies. At the time Bruns resigned, Juul published a release stating Juul “suspended all broadcast, print and digital product advertising in the US.”

As of October 9th, 95 cases of severe lung diseases were reported by Texas health officials. These patients reported vaping before symptoms began. One person died as a result according to the Texas Department of State Health Services (TDHS). Another 28 deaths possibly involving vaping are under investigation. These patients are between 13 and 75 years of age, with a median age of 22. One quarter of patients are minors. TDHS reported approximately 9 in 10 cases vaped marijuana or THC, though the dangers of nicotine are not insignificant and much is still to be researched.

Texas is a big state, with many students in the vulnerable ages of the vaping trend. The Texas A&M University system now bans e-cigarettes and vaping in every “building, outside space, parking lot, garage and laboratory” according to John Sharp, chancellor of the Texas A&M system – this means all properties, not just the 11 universities. The University of Texas system also banned vaping in an overall tobacco ban in 2017, however, the American College Health Association recommends institutions go further. Since the wording might be misconstrued as applying only to traditional tobacco products, the association believes the wording must reflect strict no-tobacco language and include all methods of smoking, including e-cigarettes and vaping. 

Will the bans help?

A USA TODAY/Ipsos poll showed 80% of people agree purchasing of vaping devices should not be allowed for people under 21. 59% of respondents believe the ban will lead users to the black market, while 82% of vapers think that is true. Users also say government regulations will not reduce users, according to another survey.

If you are vaping, consider your health and that of those around you. Statistics are not in your favor.

Contractor or Employee? California Legislature Decides.

By

Is your Uber driver a contractor or employee? What about the person delivering your favorite meal through DoorDash? California legislators passed a bill, called AB 5, on September 11 requiring employers that utilize contract workers to perform ‘gig’ type work, to change the status from contractor to employee. Governor Gavin Newsom has not signed the bill, though it is expected he will after current negotiations are resolved. Primarily this includes ride-hail drivers (like Uber and Lyft) and delivery couriers (like DoorDash) but could become more far-reaching. Other possible occupations include nail salon workers, janitors, construction workers, home repair, and telemarketers. Some exemptions* in California already exist.

Contractor or employee – ABC guidelines

There are ABC guidelines that establish the classification of an independent contractor. These workers would not be considered employees:

(A)  free from the control and direction of the hiring entity – in fact as well as by contract;

(B) the work performed by the person is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and

(C) the person hired is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as the work performed. 

This definition of an independent contractor does not generally fit ride-hail and delivery drivers.

Worker benefits

Currently California contract workers do not receive employee benefits such as vacation time, paid sick days, overtime, and reimbursement of expenses. As employees, they would receive these plus the ability to unionize and eligibility for unemployment insurance and workers’ compensation. They would have the security they currently lack. 

Employer objections to AB 5

Some employers, such as Uber, have proposed similar benefits without the classification as employees. They stress the flexibility workers currently have that they may lose as employees. Some small, often family businesses such as vineyards, or auto shops, are fearful of the effect it could have on their businesses.

The larger companies, such as Uber, threaten that this law can lead to eliminating many drivers – especially those in low traffic areas that would not justify the benefits of an employee. They also suggest schedules might need to be initiated, ridding drivers of the flexibility they desire. Experts, however, say the bill does not require set shifts, with Uber and Lyft entitled to continue letting drivers make their own schedule decisions. In fact, it would be strategic to use incentives, such as bonuses, to ensure there are sufficient available drivers at certain times and in certain places.

Current status

  • In last minute ammendments, California legislators gave larger cities the right to sue if companies don’t comply.
  • Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash pledged $90 million to support a ballot initiative that exempts them from the new law.
  • Though most drivers support the bill, many oppose it from fear it will limit their flexible schedules.
  • In July and August, Uber and Lyft worked on an agreement between labor groups and the governor’s office to establish a new category between contractor and employee while giving a minimum wage and the right to organize. The negotiations disintegrated, but company officials are optimistic a deal can be negotiated after the bill is passed.

Beyond California

New York, Alaska, and Oregon – and almost half the states –  already determined ride-hailing drivers were employees under current state laws for specific purposes. However, these findings could be overturned by new state laws clearly identifying drivers as contractors. 

There are still hurdles to make this a law across the country. For now, California with AB 5 is setting the standard, and it will be an example to other states as they deal with this massive change in the current working environment of millions of workers in California alone.

When this bill becomes law, we anticipate a law that gives security, benefits, and confidence to all contract workers in California.

_______________________

Exemptions

Specific categories of workers:

Includes (i) individuals licensed by the Department of Insurance; (ii) real estate licensees; (iii) physicians, surgeons, dentists, podiatrists, psychologists and veterinarians licensed by the State; (iv) licensed lawyers, architects, engineers, private investigators and accountants; (v) securities broker-dealers and investment advisors and their agents/representatives registered with the SEC or FIRA or licensed by the State; (vi) direct salespersons who otherwise meet Unemployment Code conditions;  and (vii) certain commercial fishermen.

Six-part test for exemption in the fields of graphic design, marketing, writing, editing, freelance photography, and human resources:

  1. Maintain a separate business location (which can be their home);
  2. Have a business license in addition to any required professional licenses;
  3. Have the ability to set or negotiate their own rates;
  4. Set their own hours (other than project deadlines);
  5. Customarily engage in the same kind of work with another entity or holds themselves out to other potential customers for the same kind of work; and
  6. Customarily and regularly exercises discretion and independent judgment in the work.

E-Cigarettes and Teen Risks

By

E-cigarettes and teen risks become more evident as teens, young adults, and even children are showing the danger signs of using these e-cigarettes in all their various forms. 

What are e-cigarettes?

An e-cigarette comes in many forms, but all have a battery that heats a liquid that turns into an aerosol containing nicotine, flavorings, and other chemicals. Like regular cigarettes, users inhale everything that is in the device and also affect others with the aerosol, much like second-hand smoke.

Not only do they contain nicotine, they can also be filled with marijuana or other drugs. The aerosol flavoring may contain diacetyl, linked to serious lung disease. In addition, the aerosol may contain cancer-causing chemicals, heavy metals – lead, nickel, tin – and ultrafine particles that can penetrate deeply into the lungs. E-cigarette aerosol is NOT harmless “water vapor.”

While packaging may claim there is no nicotine, that has proven wrong in many cases.

The many forms of e-cigarettes

While they began appearing somewhat larger than a traditional cigarette, they have morphed into a variety of shapes. JUUL is the top-selling e-cigarette and often appears as a USB flash drive. One JUUL pod has the equivalent of a 20-pack of cigarettes! Because of their easily hidden size, they are students’ favorite device. JUUL is not the only one with this USB design, however. Others include MarkTen Elite for nicotine, and PAX Era, which delivers marijuana.

Besides the USB form, e-cigarettes can look like pens, pipes, cigars, or even regular cigarettes. They have their own vocabulary as well, they may be called “e-cigs,” “e-hookahs,” “mods,” ‘vape pens,” “vapes,” “tank systems,” and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS).” No matter the name or clever packaging, they are unsafe.

Why is vaping unsafe?

Vaping is now linked to lung diseases in as many as 50 people in at least six states. No deaths are reported – yet – but several have been close calls. One of the most recent is a teen in Texas who contracted a lung disease after vaping. A New York doctor saw two cases this summer, including an athletic 18-year-old who almost died. The Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) has encountered a number of severe lung problems in Texas young people recently.  These patients were e-cigarette users, so the agency is looking into possible causes within or in addition to the vaping. They issued an alert to health care providers and clinicians to watch for symptoms and gather information.

A partial list of reasons the vaping liquid, and the device itself, can be harmful:

  • Nicotine
    • Long-ranging studies have proven the harmful effects of nicotine. This is especially true for developing brains. These changes actually affect the way a brain functions in attention and impulse control. Like nicotine from regular cigarettes, e-cigarettes can increase addiction to nicotine and possibly lead to addiction to other, even more harmful, drugs.
  • Aerosol ingredients
    • Some flavorings may be safe to eat because they’re processed through digestion. Inhaling, however, is a different process and lungs are not geared for inhaling these chemical flavorings. Because of this, scientists believe lungs could be harmed.
  • Batteries
    • There have been a number of instances where defective batteries led to serious injuries through fires or explosions.
  • Health effects
    • Scientists still do not know the full effects of e-cigarettes over time, but studies to date indicate harmful effects are likely.

How to prevent or stop the use of e-cigarettes

In Texas, the legislature is considering raising the minimum age to purchase or consume tobacco products from 18 to 21. This would include all e-cigarettes and other vaping devices. The mission of this bill is to prevent future smokers since 95 percent of smokers start before the age of 21.

While vaping devices appeared to some people as an innocent way to avoid the dangers of cigarette smoking, it is now known that it may actually introduce young people to smoking and may have the same unhealthful effects – or even more – as scientists investigate the repercussions on these youthful users.

The CDC has a number of suggestions that parents can use for having a discussion with your teen, including this Tip Sheet. An ongoing conversation can make a difference. While it may not be well-received, stopping an e-cigarette user before they’re addicted is worth the persistence.

Finally, One Less Worry for 9/11 Responders

By

With passage in the House and Senate of a 9/11 first responders bill, and signed by the president, there is finally one less worry for 9/11 responders. This legislation is named for three responders who gave their lives in the aftermath of 9/11. It is now known as “Never Forget the Heroes: James Zadroga, Ray Pfeifer, and Luis Alvarez Permanent Authorization of the September 11 Victim Compensation Act.”

The men behind the bill’s name

Zadroga, a N.Y.C. officer, in 2006 was the first to die. He passed due to a respiratory disease brought on by his exposure to the clouds of toxic particles. Next was Pfeifer, who died after fighting cancer for eight years in 2017. He worked for eight months digging through the rubble that had been the towers. Finally, this past June 29th, Alvarez, a NYPD detective, died just weeks after testifying and fighting for permanent healthcare and compensation for those physically affected by the 9/11 aftermath. He spent three months on ground zero giving aid for the recovery efforts that led to 69 rounds of chemotherapy. Each of these men fought for ongoing healthcare for first responders.

One less worry

While relieved the fight for healthcare is over, the 18 years of fighting for assistance leaves many exhausted. Most survivors are too sick to continue trips to Washington fighting for additional funding. This bill assures them that their health problems are covered until 2092, allowing them to concentrate on their medical treatments and their families instead of repeated trips to D.C.

The people who never gave up

The firebrand who famously advocated for this bill was Jon Stewart of the “Daily Show”. He brought attention of this appalling situation to the public as well as congress. An original co-sponsor of the 9/11 Victims Fund, Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-NY, was very vocal in her pursuit of justice for these men and women. Rep. Maloney vowed to wear a FDNY firefighter’s jacket, beginning in February, until the bill was passed in her effort to publicize the urgency. Other Democrats who were crucial to the passage were Chuck Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand, Senators from New York. Republicans named were Representatives Chris Collins, Mark Meadows, and Deb Fischer. John Feal, a first responder who suffered a crushed foot at ground zero and an outspoken advocate said, “I’m going to ask my team now to put down your swords and pick up your rakes and go home, and hopefully, we don’t have to come back.”

Only two senators did not vote yes: Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. Both affirm they support healthcare for survivors, but wanted money set aside to fund the bill.

The human statistics

Over 70,000 people applied to the program when it was known as the Zadroga Act. At this time, more than 32,000 enrollees now have developed respiratory or digestive diseases – and 705 people have died from them. Cancer is also an outcome, with close to 9,000 first responders afflicted and 600 who succumbed to the disease. Among the many toxins encountered in the dust and debris was asbestos. This mineral has no safe level of exposure and is known to cause many diseases, including the deadly mesothelioma. Experts reviewing these statistics warn that the deaths from the aftermath will exceed the 3,000 people who died that horrible day and may have already exceeded that number.

Sponsor statement before passage

Sen. Kristen Gillibrand who was chief sponsor of the bill, said, “Our 9/11 first responders are sick and dying, and too many of them have spent too much of their precious time left fighting to convince Congress to pass the 9/11 VCF bill. This legislation has strong bipartisan support and the votes in the Senate and the House to pass this bill as soon as it comes to the floor. This all comes down to political will and whether Congress is truly willing to ‘never forget’ the heroes of 9/11.”

Finally, one less worry for 9/11 responders.