Posts Tagged ‘Mesothelioma’

Asbestos Industry Spends Millions To Keep Sales Going

Saturday, July 24th, 2010

asbestos worker in china

A recent news report,  Dangers In the Dust: Inside the Global Asbestos Trade, by the BBC and the International Coalition of Investigative Journalists reveals that the asbestos industry has spent over $100 million in recent years to lobby and promote the continued use of asbestos  in developing nations around the world.

Part of the asbestos industry’s effort has included using industry-funded researchers to place into the scientific literature hundreds of articles claiming the chrysotile asbestos can be used safely. Their central position is that chrysotile, or white abestsos, is the only kind sold today and they claim it is orders of magnitude safer than brown or blue asbestos.

The industry’s position flies in the face of world scientific consensus from such groups as the World Health Organization, American Public Health Organization, the International Commission on Occupational Health, the EPA and 52 nations around the world that have banned the use of all forms of asbestos including chrysotile.

Perhaps nowhere is the industry as strong as in India, the world’s second-largest consumer of asbestos after China. There are more than 400 asbestos cement factories in India and the asbestos market is growing at a rate of about 30% annually. Tragically, if developing nations don’t begin to ban the use of asbestos, and nations such as Canada and Russia continue to export asbestos, the death toll of asbestos victims globally will continue throughout the 21st century. Already, at current consumption rates, China is expected to have 10,000 to 15,000 asbestos-related deaths per year by 2035.  This after the United States and Europe continue to suffer thousands of asbestos related deaths a year from now decades old asbestos use.  

Help stop history from repeating itself. Contribute the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat or help urge Canada to ban the export of asbestos to already troubled nations around the world.

New Report Shows Asbestos Still a Global Business

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

Indian Workers Protest Asbestos

Despite proven links to cancer, a ban in the European Union and restrictions in the United States, industry lobbyists have ensured that asbestos is still very much in demand in the developing world, a report out today shows.

An investigation conducted by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and the BBC, Dangers In the Dust: Inside the Global Asbestos Trade ,  found that the asbestos industry has ignored waves of asbestos-related disease around the world that have led to bans or restrictions in 52 countries, and continues to ply the mineral in developing nations.

More than half of the two million metric tons of asbestos that were mined worldwide in 2009 was exported to developing countries India and Mexico, where demand is high for cheap building materials.

Most of the asbestos sold in those countries is used in cement for corrugated roofing, in water pipes and for home construction.

The asbestos industry’s growth has been fueled by an marketing campaign of international industry groups and led by the Canadian government backed Chrysotile Institute.

Asbestos fibers when inhaled can cause a variety of diseases in humans, including lung cancer and mesothelioma, a cancer of the lining of the lung.   The continued export of asbestos to developing countries will tragically create a new generation of asbestos victims far into the 21st century.

Canadian Cancer Association Fights Against Asbestos Mining

Tuesday, July 13th, 2010

The Canadian Cancer Society  is standing up with other public health groups   and international scientists to call for an end to Canadian asbestos mining. The Cancer Society stepped in to urge Premier Jean Charest to deny a $58 million loan to keep the Asbestos, Quebec mine, currently in bankruptcy, operating for 25 more years.  Asbestos, a known carcinogen, is blamed for causing mesothelioma, lung cancer, asbestosis and other respiratory illnesses which continue to develop around the world including Canada and the US.  

The action was followed by the town of Asbestos cancelling their participation in one of the Canadian Cancer Society’s premier fundraising events, Relay for Life.  The mayor of Asbestos said, “We want to work with our partners and not with our detractors,” and believes that asbestos is safe when properly handled. 

Canada is a major exporter of asbestos to developing nations such as India, Mexico and Brazil where asbestos is still used in new construction materials.  Countless workers will continue to develop asbestos disease in these countries for decades to come as a result of Canada’s actions.

Even small amounts of asbestos when inhaled can cause mesothelioma, lung cancer and other asbestos related diseases. 

The Cancer Society states that their concern is the health of the public and “we are concerned about the fact that asbestos is a fiber that is killing people.”   The Canadian Cancer Society vows to continue to apply pressure to politicians, and to put Canada’s public health first.   Other Canadian organizations have joined the cause, including the Canadian Public Health Association and the Canadian Medical Association.

NIOSH Taking Comments on Asbestos Bulletin

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

Asbestos remains an environmental hazard in 2009.  Just how many U.S. workers are still exposed to asbestos fibers on the job is unknown, but OSHA estimated in 2008 that 1.3 million workers in construction and general industry may still face significant exposures. NIOSH now has released a revised current intelligence bulletin (the full bulletin is located at www.cdc.gov/niosh/review/public/099-C/pdfs/AsbestosRoadmapPublicDraftV4a.pdf  ) for asbestos fibers in which the agency explains what it still wants to research and clarifies the 1990 NIOSH recommended exposure limit (REL) for airborne asbestos fibers.
That REL, 0.1 airborne asbestos fibers per cubic centimeter, has created confusion over which materials included in the NIOSH definition are “asbestos” and whether the definition is optimal for protecting workers’ health. The revised document, for which NIOSH seeks comments by April 16, clarifies but does not change the exposure limit. The REL now is “0.1 countable elongate mineral particles from one or more covered minerals per cubic centimeter averaged over 100 minutes where:

• A countable elongate mineral particle (EMP) is an fiber or fragment of a mineral longer than 5 um with a minimum aspect ratio of 3:1 when viewed microscopically using NIOSH Analytical Method #7400(‘A’ rules) or its equivalent; and
• A covered material is any mineral having the crystal structure and elemental composition of: one of the asbestos varieties (chrysotile, riebeckite asbestos [crocidolite], cummingtonite-grunerite asbestos [amosite], anthophyllite asbestos, tremolite asbestos, and actinolite asbestos) or one of their nonasbestiform analogs (the serpentine minerals antigorite and lizardite, and the amphibole minerals contained in the cummingtonite-grunerite mineral series, the tremolite-ferroactinolite mineral series, and the glaucophane-riebeckite mineral series.)”

The NIOSH draft indicates U.S. imports of asbestos have dropped  from 35,000 metric tons in 1991 to under 3,000 metric tons in 2006 and 2007, with domestic production having ceased in 2003.  However, worldwide use stood at 2 million metric tons as recently as 2006, mainly for use in building materials, according to the draft.

Approximately 3,000 individuals are diagnosed annually in the US with mesothelioma, a cancer of the lining of the lung caused by asbestos exposure.  Still others continue to be diagnosed with other asbestos-related diseases such as lung cancer and asbestosis. Because of the long latency period between exposure and related disease, asbestos related deaths in the United States “are anticipated to occur for several decades,” according to the draft.

Canada Continues to Export Asbestos

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

In spite of the now well-known health hazards of asbestos, including mesothelioma and lung cancer, the Canadian government continues to mine asbestos because of the economic incentive of selling the deadly fiber to developing countries. Canada is the second-largest exporter of the mineral after Russia. The world’s largest open pit asbestos mine continues to be operated to this day in the Canadian province of Quebec.
What’s more, unlike countries in the European Union, as well as Japan, Australia and Saudi Arabia, Canada has not banned asbestos. Rather, the Canadian federal government actively promotes its use globally. In 2008 Canadian asbestos exports exceeded $92 million in sales – all to developing countries such as Brazil, Mexico, and India.
The World Health Organization has labeled all types of asbestos, including chrysotile, as carcinogenic. It is banned in many developed countries, including New Zealand, Australia and all European Union countries.
The Canadian government has actively fought to keep asbestos off a U.N.-sponsored list of dangerous substances. If included on the list, called the Rotterdam Convention, any country looking to import asbestos would be informed of all the potential risks and would have to agree in advance to accept any shipments.
Julia Langer, director of the global threats program at the World Wildlife Fund in Canada, one of the groups pressuring the United Nations to restrict the export of asbestos, said the move was despicable. Including asbestos on the list “could have saved a lot of lives,” she said.
In the most recent update to the Rotterdam Convention’s Prior Informed Consent list in October 2008, chrysotile was again left off after India, Pakistan, Vietnam and the Philippines objected. To be added to the list, consensus must be reached.
Quebec’s asbestos industry has moved up a notch with Premier Jean Charest’s trade mission to India, one of the biggest importers of Canadian asbestos.
Over 100 scientists from 28 countries have recently authored a joint letter to Quebec Premier Jean Charest calling for a ban on Quebec’s export of asbestos to the developing world
The industrial and medical communities have known for decades that asbestos causes lung cancer and mesothelioma in humans. The fact the Canadian government continues to mine and export this deadly substance to developing countries is appalling. New generations of unprotected workers in developing countries will develop cancer as a result of Canada’s actions. To learn more and to help stop the Canadian asbestos mines see www.bacanada.org

Merlin Olsen Diagnosed with Mesothelioma

Friday, January 8th, 2010

    

     Football Hall of Famer Merlin Olsen is the latest celebrity victim of mesothelioma – an incurable and aggressive form of cancer caused by asbestos exposure.      Olsen has recently filed a lawsuit against numerous asbestos manufacturers claiming  that  years of exposure to asbestos at jobs ranging from construction to working for NBC and 20th Century Fox caused his recently diagnosed cancer.

     Olsen, 69, sued NBC Studios and more than two dozen other companies in California Superior Court, alleging that regular exposure to asbestos since he was around 10 years old gave him mesothelioma, a deadly form of cancer for which he is receiving chemotherapy.

     Olsen says he was exposed to asbestos while working as a laborer and construction worker during summers and after school from the time he was 10 through college. Later in his career, he says, he was around workers who were using “asbestos drywall patching compounds.”


      During the period he was exposed to asbestos, “the manufacturers of asbestos products did not warn of the lethal hazards of breathing asbestos dust, despite the fact that these asbestos companies knew that breathing small amounts of asbestos dust could be fatal,” Olsen says in the 28-page complaint.     Olsen was diagnosed with mesothelioma in July 2009.


      Olsen spent 15 years with the Los Angeles Rams, and was elected to the NFL Hall of Fame in 1982.    Later he became a sportscaster and an actor, starring in the show “Little House on the Prairie” and others.

Asbestos Contamination at Montana Quarry Possible

Tuesday, March 17th, 2009

A cement company operation near Helena, Montana is investigating possible asbestos contamination at its quarry and the company has told employees they should not report for work until instructed to do so.

Tremolite, an asbestos contaminant, may be found in portions of the cement company’s quarry. Test results from samples taken by the company are still pending.  All forms of asbestos, including tremolite, cause a variety of cancers including mesothelioma and lung cancer. 

Vermiculite mined near the northwestern Montana town of Libby also contained tremolite.  A federal trial is under way in Missoula on allegations that mine operator W.R. Grace & Co. and five former company officials knowingly allowed human exposure to the asbestos, which was dispersed beyond the mine site to points all over the United States. The W.R. Grace mine closed in 1990.

For more information on the Helena, Montana quarry, see the following link:  www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2009/03/16/ap6173604.html

WR Grace Asbestos Trial Makes Twitter

Wednesday, March 11th, 2009

W.R. Grace & Co.’s alleged efforts to cover up the spread of deadly asbestos contamination from its Libby, Mont., mining operations are now Twitter fodder, thanks to a joint effort of University of Montana’s law and journalism students. 

Grace Case is not only a blow-by-blow blog of the country’s largest-ever environmental crimes trial, it offers a repository of case documents, analysis of legal issues, a collection of profiles of the main players and link to a multi-media documentary entitled “Living with Grace,” a masters thesis by graduate student Kristine Paulsen.

Libby residents suffer from extremely high rates of mesothelioma and other asbestos diseases as a result of the W.R. Grace Vermiculite mine located in the mountains above the small town.

Dallas mesothelioma attorney, Ben DuBose, has represented several mesothelioma victims exposed to the Grace vermiculite. 

For more information about the University of Montana’s Grace Case blog see www.blogs.wsj.com/bankruptcy/2009/03/11/montana-students-twitter-grace-case/

W.R. Grace Criminal Trial Postponed

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

MISSOULA, Mont. — the W.R. Grace & Co. asbestos environmental crimes trial was delayed yesterday by a juror’s illness, but with the jury absent, defense lawyers sought to exclude the expert testimony of another government witness.

The W.R. Grace vermiculite mine just outside of Libby Montana exposed residents of the town to asbestos for decades.  The local vermiculite is contaminated with asbestos.  Grace shipped the asbestos contaminated vermiculate all over the United States for resale in a long list of consumer and construction products. 

 Dallas mesothelioma lawyer, Ben DuBose, has represented clients exposed to the Grace vermiculite.  DuBose states “tragically, Libby residents suffer from an unusually high rate of asbestos disease and asbestos related deaths, including an abnormally high rate of the rare disease malignant mesothelioma.”

U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy excused jurors for the morning Monday to determine whether an alternate juror would need to be selected but told lawyers to meet back in the courtroom after lunch.

The Columbia, Md.-based global chemical company and five individual defendants filed a motion Sunday to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Aubrey Miller, an investigator with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and a key witness for the prosecution.

The defense was successful earlier in limiting the testimony of another key witness, Paul Peronard, who served as the EPA’s onsite coordinator in Libby after the town’s asbestos contamination came to light a decade ago.

Grace’s lawyers said Miller, as with Peronard, should not be allowed to discuss issues of public endangerment because “it does not fit the legal issue that the Government hopes to prove through its introduction at trial” — that the defendants placed others in imminent danger by causing releases of asbestos into the air after Nov. 3, 1999.

The company and five one-time Grace officials are charged with a federal conspiracy involving Clean Air Act violations and obstruction of justice.

At issue in the trial is whether the company and its top employees knew they endangered the community of Libby by mining the asbestos-laced ore, and whether they did so in violation of federal law.

Illinois Jury Awards $2.6 Million to Family of Mesothelioma Victim

Friday, March 6th, 2009

BLOOMINGTON, Ill. – A McLean County jury has awarded $2.6 million to the family of a woman who died as a result of malignant mesothelioma – a cancer of the lining of the lung. Jean Holmes died in April 2006 of mesothelioma.

According to court records, Holmes was exposed to asbestos when she laundered clothing belonging to her husband, Donald Holmes, who worked at Bloomington’s Union Asbestos and Rubber Company in the 1960s.

Attorneys for the Holmes’ family argued that she was never warned of the dangers of asbestos.

Counsel for the defense claimed defendants Pneumo Abex LLC and Honeywell International, Inc., through their corporate predecessors, conspired with other companies to suppress information about the hazards of asbestos.